CompsDesk

IEP vs KWR: core financials compared

ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P. vs QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION · IEP FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) vs KWR FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) · computed from SEC XBRL filings

KWR leads on 4 of the directional core metrics; IEP on 0.
MetricIEP
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
KWR
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
Revenue$9.66B$1.89B
Revenue growth (YoY)-3.6%2.7%
Operating margin-3.6%2.8%
Net margin-3.1%-0.1%
FCF margin-6.8%4.3%
Capex % of revenue3.5%3.0%

Want IEP against its full peer set, not just KWR?

A CompsDesk subscription covers unlimited packs: up to 12 peers you choose, up to 19 metrics (6 core guaranteed), trends for every filed year (up to five), the subject's figures cited to their SEC tag, form and period with every company identified by its CIK — PDF-ready HTML + CSV, generated on demand.

See subscription plans →

Each column is that company's OWN annual period, labeled above with its fiscal year and period end. KWR's is the annual period ending closest to IEP's 2025-12-31: where KWR has already filed a fiscal year IEP has not, this comparison uses KWR's matching period rather than that later one. Fiscal calendars differ across companies, so two matching fiscal years can still end months apart, on either side of each other: past 183 days no winner is called, and past 400 days the column reads "n.m." throughout and nothing is compared across it. Green = better on that metric where direction is unambiguous. Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (10-K). "n/a" = not disclosed under mapped tags; never estimated. Informational benchmarking, not investment advice. © CompsDesk / Sam Arora.