CompsDesk

ATI vs BDC: core financials compared

ATI INC vs BELDEN INC. · ATI FY2025 (ended 2025-12-28) vs BDC FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) · computed from SEC XBRL filings

ATI and BDC are evenly matched, each leading on 2 of the directional core metrics.
MetricATI
FY2025 · 2025-12-28
BDC
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
Revenue$4.59B$2.72B
Revenue growth (YoY)5.2%10.3%
Operating margin14.0%11.6%
Net margin8.8%8.7%
FCF margin7.3%8.1%
Capex % of revenue6.1%5.0%

Want ATI against its full peer set, not just BDC?

A CompsDesk subscription covers unlimited packs: up to 12 peers you choose, up to 23 metrics (6 core guaranteed), trends for every filed year (up to five), the subject's figures cited to their SEC tag, form and period with every company identified by its CIK — PDF-ready HTML + CSV, generated on demand.

See subscription plans →

Each column is that company's OWN annual period, labeled above with its fiscal year and period end. BDC's is the annual period ending closest to ATI's 2025-12-28: where BDC has already filed a fiscal year ATI has not, this comparison uses BDC's matching period rather than that later one. Fiscal calendars differ across companies, so two matching fiscal years can still end months apart, on either side of each other: past 183 days no winner is called, and past 400 days the column reads "n.m." throughout and nothing is compared across it. Green = better on that metric where direction is unambiguous. Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (10-K). "n/a" = not disclosed under mapped tags; never estimated. Informational benchmarking, not investment advice. © CompsDesk / Sam Arora.