CompsDesk

ARCB vs BCO: core financials compared

ARCBEST CORPORATION vs THE BRINK’S COMPANY · ARCB FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) vs BCO FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) · computed from SEC XBRL filings

BCO leads on 4 of the directional core metrics; ARCB on 0.
MetricARCB
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
BCO
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
Revenue$4.01B$5.26B
Revenue growth (YoY)-4.0%5.0%
Operating margin2.3%11.1%
Net margin1.5%3.8%
FCF margin2.8%8.3%
Capex % of revenue2.9%3.9%

Want ARCB against its full peer set, not just BCO?

A CompsDesk subscription covers unlimited packs: up to 12 peers you choose, up to 19 metrics (6 core guaranteed), trends for every filed year (up to five), the subject's figures cited to their SEC tag, form and period with every company identified by its CIK — PDF-ready HTML + CSV, generated on demand.

See subscription plans →

Each column is that company's OWN annual period, labeled above with its fiscal year and period end. BCO's is the annual period ending closest to ARCB's 2025-12-31: where BCO has already filed a fiscal year ARCB has not, this comparison uses BCO's matching period rather than that later one. Fiscal calendars differ across companies, so two matching fiscal years can still end months apart, on either side of each other: past 183 days no winner is called, and past 400 days the column reads "n.m." throughout and nothing is compared across it. Green = better on that metric where direction is unambiguous. Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (10-K). "n/a" = not disclosed under mapped tags; never estimated. Informational benchmarking, not investment advice. © CompsDesk / Sam Arora.