CompsDesk

ADTN vs AIP: core financials compared

ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. vs Arteris, Inc. · ADTN FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) vs AIP FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) · computed from SEC XBRL filings

ADTN leads on 3 of the directional core metrics; AIP on 1.
MetricADTN
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
AIP
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
Revenue$1.08B$70.6M
Revenue growth (YoY)17.5%22.3%
Operating margin-1.4%-47.0%
Net margin-4.2%-49.2%
FCF margin9.0%7.6%
Capex % of revenue2.9%2.0%

Want ADTN against its full peer set, not just AIP?

A CompsDesk subscription covers unlimited packs: up to 12 peers you choose, up to 19 metrics (6 core guaranteed), trends for every filed year (up to five), the subject's figures cited to their SEC tag, form and period with every company identified by its CIK — PDF-ready HTML + CSV, generated on demand.

See subscription plans →

Each column is that company's OWN annual period, labeled above with its fiscal year and period end. AIP's is the annual period ending closest to ADTN's 2025-12-31: where AIP has already filed a fiscal year ADTN has not, this comparison uses AIP's matching period rather than that later one. Fiscal calendars differ across companies, so two matching fiscal years can still end months apart, on either side of each other: past 183 days no winner is called, and past 400 days the column reads "n.m." throughout and nothing is compared across it. Green = better on that metric where direction is unambiguous. Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (10-K). "n/a" = not disclosed under mapped tags; never estimated. Informational benchmarking, not investment advice. © CompsDesk / Sam Arora.