CompsDesk

ABM vs ADT: core financials compared

ABM INDUSTRIES INC vs ADT Inc. · ABM FY2025 (ended 2025-10-31) vs ADT FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) · computed from SEC XBRL filings

ADT leads on 4 of the directional core metrics; ABM on 0.
MetricABM
FY2025 · 2025-10-31
ADT
FY2025 · 2025-12-31
Revenue$8.75B$5.13B
Revenue growth (YoY)4.6%4.7%
Operating margin3.6%25.5%
Net margin1.9%11.6%
FCF margin1.8%33.3%
Capex % of revenue0.9%3.4%

Want ABM against its full peer set, not just ADT?

A CompsDesk subscription covers unlimited packs: up to 12 peers you choose, up to 19 metrics (6 core guaranteed), trends for every filed year (up to five), the subject's figures cited to their SEC tag, form and period with every company identified by its CIK — PDF-ready HTML + CSV, generated on demand.

See subscription plans →

Each column is that company's OWN annual period, labeled above with its fiscal year and period end. ADT's is the annual period ending closest to ABM's 2025-10-31: where ADT has already filed a fiscal year ABM has not, this comparison uses ADT's matching period rather than that later one. Fiscal calendars differ across companies, so two matching fiscal years can still end months apart, on either side of each other: past 183 days no winner is called, and past 400 days the column reads "n.m." throughout and nothing is compared across it. Green = better on that metric where direction is unambiguous. Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (10-K). "n/a" = not disclosed under mapped tags; never estimated. Informational benchmarking, not investment advice. © CompsDesk / Sam Arora.